California’s Ban on Addictive Feeds for Minors Gets Judicial Green Light
A federal judge upholds California’s SB 976, banning “addictive feeds” for minors without parental consent. Discover its implications for tech giants and user safety.
California’s SB 976 Takes Effect Amid Legal Pushback
Late Tuesday evening, a federal judge rejected a challenge by tech industry group NetChoice, allowing California’s groundbreaking law, SB 976, to take effect. This legislation prohibits tech companies from providing “addictive feeds” to minors without explicit parental consent.
The law aims to curtail the influence of behavior-driven algorithms on young users, marking a significant milestone in digital regulation. SB 976 classifies an addictive feed as any algorithm that recommends content based on user behavior rather than explicit preferences—a definition targeting practices widely used by platforms like Meta and Google.
New Compliance Requirements for Tech Companies
Effective immediately, companies serving California users identified as minors must adjust their practices or secure parental consent to deliver personalized, algorithm-driven content. Looking ahead, beginning January 2027, platforms will need to implement “age assurance techniques,” such as age estimation models, to identify minors and ensure compliance.
This decision follows years of growing concern over the impact of algorithmic feeds on mental health, especially among younger audiences. Lawmakers believe these measures could be a model for other states exploring similar legislative initiatives.
Mixed Outcome for Tech Giants
NetChoice, whose members include tech heavyweights such as Meta, Google, and X, previously sought to block the law entirely, arguing it infringes on First Amendment rights. While the judge upheld the core provisions of SB 976, certain restrictions—like bans on nighttime notifications for minors—were blocked.
Despite this partial victory, the ruling underscores the growing scrutiny of big tech’s business practices. NetChoice expressed disappointment with the outcome, reiterating concerns about free speech and the potential challenges of implementing age-verification measures at scale.
A Nationwide Trend in Digital Regulation
California’s bold move mirrors recent legislation in New York, which passed similar restrictions in June. These efforts signal a shift in how states approach digital governance, focusing on protecting vulnerable users from potentially harmful practices. With growing bipartisan support for increased regulation, more states may soon follow suit.
What’s Next?
SB 976’s implications could ripple beyond California, challenging tech companies to rethink their algorithms and content delivery systems. For users, especially parents, this law represents a step toward greater transparency and control over what children consume online.
As debates over digital rights and responsibilities continue, California’s latest move adds fuel to the broader discussion: How should society balance innovation with the safety and well-being of its most vulnerable members?
(Disclaimer: This article summarizes legal developments related to California’s SB 976 and its implications. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.)
Also Read: Strengthen Your Startup’s Defenses: Cybersecurity Resolutions for 2025