Azharuddin Fights Back Over Stadium Name Row
Former India cricket captain Mohammad Azharuddin threatens legal action after an order to remove his name from Uppal Stadium. The controversy highlights ongoing tensions within the Hyderabad Cricket Association.
Azharuddin Pushes Back: Stadium Naming Row Sparks Legal Showdown
Former Indian cricket captain Mohammad Azharuddin has found himself at the center of a controversy that goes beyond sport—into governance, legacy, and the right to recognition. The Hyderabad Cricket Association’s (HCA) recent move to strip his name from a pavilion at the Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium has sparked a heated response. Azharuddin isn’t just protesting; he’s preparing to take the matter to court.
A Captain’s Legacy Under Fire
The North Pavilion Stand, once renamed in Azharuddin’s honor, is now at the heart of a contentious order issued by the HCA Ombudsman, Justice V. Eswaraiah. The directive followed a petition from the Lords Cricket Club (LCC), which accused Azharuddin of using his authority during his tenure as HCA president to replace the original name—‘VVS Laxman Stand’—with his own.
Azharuddin, however, is not backing down. “Am I a fool to remove a legend like Laxman’s name?” he asked pointedly, adding that Laxman still has a pavilion named after him within the same stadium. “It is a shame that an India captain’s name is being asked to be removed,” he told PTI, voicing both frustration and disbelief.
Challenging Authority and Timelines
Azharuddin argues that the Ombudsman’s order holds no legal ground, citing a lapse in tenure. According to HCA by-laws, the Ombudsman’s term ended on February 18, 2025, and no formal extension was granted via an Annual General Meeting. “So how did he pass an order?” Azhar questioned, highlighting what he sees as a blatant breach of procedural norms.
This legal gray area forms the crux of Azharuddin’s challenge. He plans to approach the High Court, not just to contest the decision, but to call into question the legitimacy of an expired authority acting beyond its mandate.
A Cricket Body Mired in Internal Conflict
This isn’t the first time the HCA has come under scrutiny. In recent years, it has been embroiled in administrative disputes, power struggles, and allegations of poor governance. Azharuddin’s allegations go further—he accuses the Lords Cricket Club of lacking transparency and hints at deeper corruption within the association.
“You take down names of Abid Ali, Tiger Pataudi, and ML Jaisimha. This is one association that doesn’t respect its players,” he said, his voice reflecting the hurt of a veteran who feels sidelined.
The Bigger Picture: Respecting Cricketing Icons
This controversy brings into sharp focus a larger issue in Indian cricket—how former players are remembered and honored. While stadiums across the country carry the names of cricketing greats, the process of deciding who gets recognized often becomes entangled in politics and power play.
VVS Laxman and Mohammad Azharuddin are two of the most respected cricketers from Hyderabad. Instead of fostering rivalry, the association could have celebrated both by finding meaningful ways to honor their contributions without diminishing either legacy. As Azharuddin pointed out, there was no removal—only a new dedication, and both names currently coexist in the venue.
Legal Path Ahead
With court proceedings likely to unfold in the coming weeks, the outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for how sports associations across India handle matters of legacy and honor. It also raises important questions about transparency, ethics, and procedural correctness within sporting bodies.
The court will now determine whether the Ombudsman’s order stands on shaky legal ground—or whether it signals a need to reevaluate how decisions of recognition are made.
Final Thoughts
This isn’t just about whose name adorns a pavilion—it’s about how institutions honor those who’ve shaped the sport. Mohammad Azharuddin’s response, though emotional, is also emblematic of a deeper struggle: the right of a sporting legend to defend his place in history. As the legal battle unfolds, the cricketing world watches closely, hoping that dignity, fairness, and respect will ultimately prevail.
Disclaimer:
This article is based on publicly available statements and reports as of April 2025. The views and claims presented by individuals are their own. This content is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
source : Times Now