Encode Challenges OpenAI’s Shift to For-Profit Status Over Safety Concerns
Encode opposes OpenAI’s for-profit transition, citing risks to AI safety and public benefit. Key AI pioneers back the legal challenge.
Encode Raises Concerns Over OpenAI’s Transformation
In a high-stakes legal move, Encode, a nonprofit championing AI safety, has formally requested permission to submit an amicus curiae brief supporting Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI. Musk seeks to halt OpenAI’s transition from a nonprofit research entity to a for-profit Delaware Public Benefit Corporation (PBC).
Encode argues that OpenAI’s structural shift threatens the organization’s original mission of ensuring artificial intelligence development prioritizes safety and public benefit.
In its filing to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Encode’s legal team emphasized the risks of the transition:
“If the world truly is at the cusp of a new age of artificial general intelligence (AGI), then the public has a profound interest in having that technology controlled by a public charity legally bound to prioritize safety and the public benefit.”
Encode founder Sneha Revanur went further, accusing OpenAI of abandoning its ethical obligations. “They are internalizing AI’s profits while externalizing its consequences to humanity. The courts must act to safeguard the public interest,” Revanur stated.
Backing from AI Pioneers
The challenge has garnered notable endorsements, including AI luminary Geoffrey Hinton, who was recently awarded the 2024 Nobel Prize, and UC Berkeley professor Stuart Russell, a leading authority on human-compatible AI.
“OpenAI was explicitly founded as a safety-focused nonprofit,” Hinton noted in a press release. “Shifting to a for-profit structure undermines their credibility and sends a dangerous precedent to others in the field.”
From Nonprofit to For-Profit: A Controversial Transition
Founded in 2015, OpenAI began as a nonprofit with a mission to develop AI technologies for the greater good. However, escalating operational costs and ambitions led to its current hybrid structure—a for-profit entity governed by a nonprofit board with capped profits for investors.
Under the proposed changes, OpenAI plans to shift its for-profit arm into a Delaware PBC, which legally obliges it to balance public interest with shareholder profits. Critics contend that this setup leads to an unavoidable conflict of interest. According to Encode’s brief, “The directors of a Public Benefit Corporation have no obligation to the public whatsoever.”
The Broader Implications
Encode highlights potential risks, such as diminished accountability and safety measures. The nonprofit’s counsel cited concerns that OpenAI, as a for-profit entity, would no longer adhere to commitments like avoiding competition with value-aligned safety-conscious projects nearing AGI development.
Miles Brundage, a former OpenAI policy researcher, echoed these fears in recent social media posts, warning that OpenAI’s nonprofit could become a “side thing,” leaving the PBC to operate as a standard profit-driven corporation.
Facebook’s parent company, Meta, has also weighed in, calling OpenAI’s proposed shift “seismic” for Silicon Valley. In a December letter to California Attorney General Rob Bonta, Meta voiced its opposition, aligning itself with Encode’s concerns.
Balancing Innovation and Public Responsibility
As the debate unfolds, Encode continues to advocate for regulatory frameworks that ensure AI technology remains safe and beneficial. The nonprofit has contributed to several pivotal AI policy initiatives, including the White House’s AI Bill of Rights and President Biden’s executive order on AI.
For now, all eyes are on the U.S. District Court as it deliberates the future of OpenAI’s structure and its implications for the broader AI ecosystem.
(Just a heads up: This article is meant to inform you, but please don’t take it as legal or financial guidance.)
Also Read: Nvidia’s Next Frontier: Powering the Rise of Humanoid Robots