U.S. Weighs Delay on Major Chip Tariffs Amid China Risks
U.S. officials are reconsidering the timeline for steep semiconductor tariffs, balancing political pressures, consumer prices, and delicate relations with China.
The Biden-to-Trump economic transition has long been defined by tough rhetoric on trade, but behind closed doors, U.S. officials are signaling a surprising shift: the administration may slow its rollout of sweeping semiconductor tariffs that were once promoted as a cornerstone of President Donald Trump’s economic agenda. The quiet recalibration reflects a tightrope walk between domestic political pressures and the risk of reigniting tensions with Beijing.
Tariffs on foreign-made chips, particularly those coming from China have been a defining message in Trump’s push to rebuild U.S. manufacturing. Last August, he pledged import duties of roughly 100% on semiconductors while offering exemptions for companies that manufacture in the United States or have committed to doing so.
For months, industry groups and government partners were told that the tariffs were imminent. That expectation, however, has recently shifted. According to individuals familiar with private conversations inside the administration, internal deliberations about timing, strategy, and geopolitical consequences have slowed momentum.
The plan is part of a broader national security strategy: the administration argues that America’s deep dependence on foreign-made chips and pharmaceutical ingredients leaves critical supply chains vulnerable. In April, U.S. trade officials launched investigations into both categories, laying the groundwork for potential tariffs.
Internal Signals of a Slowdown
Over the past several days, U.S. officials have quietly told key stakeholders, ranging from semiconductor manufacturers to policy advocates, that the long-promised wave of chip tariffs may not arrive as soon as expected. Four individuals familiar with the conversations say the White House is taking a far more cautious approach behind the scenes, despite previously giving assurances that tariffs were on the near horizon.
This hesitation is driven largely by concerns about the broader impact on trade relations with China, according to two sources directly involved in the discussions. Officials fear that moving too aggressively could provoke Beijing at a moment when both governments are trying to maintain a fragile truce.
Avoiding a Renewed Trade Clash
Top advisers worry that strict, immediate tariffs could trigger a tit-for-tat escalation reminiscent of the earlier U.S.–China trade war. Such a clash could destabilize access to rare earth minerals, materials essential for high-tech manufacturing and clean energy technologies.
Sources stress that the White House has made no final decisions and that the possibility of imposing triple-digit tariffs remains alive. But the tone of recent briefings suggests the administration is increasingly aware of the economic and geopolitical stakes.
White House Pushback
Despite these behind-the-scenes discussions, official spokespeople insist that the administration’s stance has not changed.
Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, said the administration remains fully committed to using every available executive authority to reshore manufacturing vital to national and economic security. He dismissed anonymously sourced reports indicating otherwise as inaccurate.
A Commerce Department representative echoed that there has been “no change” in department policy regarding potential semiconductor tariffs under Section 232. Neither clarified when the long-threatened tariffs might be finalized or what modifications if any, are being considered.
China Calls for Cooperation
China, meanwhile, is urging collaboration rather than confrontation. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington, Liu Pengyu, said both countries should honor the commitments made during the Busan summit between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping. Liu emphasized that maintaining a stable, cooperative semiconductor supply chain would benefit businesses on both sides and support global tech stability.
Consumer Prices in the Spotlight
The political stakes around tariff timing are high. With the holiday season approaching, Trump faces increasing voter frustration over consumer prices. Chips power everything from smartphones to refrigerators, meaning any additional tax on semiconductors could quickly raise the price of everyday electronics.
A report last September revealed that the administration had explored taxing foreign electronic devices based on the number of chips inside each product, a plan that could significantly expand the financial impact on consumers.
Although Trump recently cut tariffs on more than 200 food items, he maintains that his broader import tariffs have not meaningfully contributed to inflation. However, inflation data remains incomplete due to the recent U.S. government shutdown.
Managing Relations with Beijing
The balancing act extends beyond economics. Trump and Xi’s meeting last month in South Korea was billed as a reset, aiming to set aside disputes and avoid further trade escalation. Even then, U.S. officials privately warned Chinese counterparts that national security actions in the coming months may be met with displeasure in Beijing.
The administration believes tariffs can revive jobs lost to global offshoring, particularly in industrial states that helped shape Trump’s political base. But heavy-handed measures risk jeopardizing the delicate diplomatic progress made in recent talks.
The administration’s internal debate over semiconductor tariffs reflects the broader challenge of governing in an era of intertwined economic and geopolitical priorities. While Trump continues to publicly champion aggressive trade measures, behind the scenes his team appears more mindful of the risks, both for consumers and for the global supply chain.
Whether the U.S. ultimately moves ahead with the full force of the proposed tariffs remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the decision will shape not only the tech industry’s future, but also the country’s economic trajectory and foreign policy direction during a critical moment on the world stage.
ALSO READ: AI at a Crossroads: Cracks, Concerns, and the Fight for Digital Trust