Controversy Surrounds Redesign of Lady Justice Statue at India’s Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India has recently unveiled a redesigned statue of Lady Justice, sparking a significant debate over its symbolic changes. Notably, the traditional blindfold has been removed, and the sword has been replaced with the Indian Constitution. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud emphasized that these alterations reflect a commitment to a more aware and inclusive judiciary. However, critics question whether removing the blindfold undermines the principle of impartiality in justice. Reactions from political figures and the public have been mixed, with some praising the redesign as a step forward while others express concerns about its implications for judicial independence and fairness.
The Supreme Court of India has recently unveiled a redesigned statue of Lady Justice, and the changes to its symbolism have stirred a considerable amount of debate. The statue, long associated with impartiality and fairness in the judicial system, has undergone significant alterations, most notably the removal of her iconic blindfold and the replacement of the sword with the Indian Constitution. Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, explained that these changes represent a shift in the judiciary’s values. The open eyes of the statue symbolize that justice “sees all equally,” moving away from the traditional notion that “law is blind.”
Another major change is the replacement of the sword, traditionally a symbol of the law’s authority and power to both punish and protect. The new statue holds the Indian Constitution instead, signaling that justice is delivered in accordance with constitutional laws rather than through force or violence. This move is part of a broader effort to shed the remnants of India’s colonial past, similar to the recent replacement of the Indian Penal Code with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Lady Justice statue also features a more Indianized appearance, draped in a saree instead of western robes, reflecting Indian cultural heritage.
However, not everyone has welcomed the redesign. While some have praised the new statue as a forward-thinking representation of an aware, inclusive, and vigilant judiciary, others are concerned that removing the blindfold undermines the long-standing symbol of judicial impartiality. Critics argue that this change could be interpreted as a deviation from the principle that justice should be delivered without bias, regardless of wealth, status, or influence.
Political figures have also weighed in. Union Law and Justice Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal praised the new statue, calling it a respectful tribute to the Constitution. In contrast, Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut sharply criticized the move, calling it a part of a political agenda and questioning the rationale behind the replacement of the sword and blindfold. He expressed concerns that this change might symbolize an openness to corruption and a departure from constitutional principles.
Public reactions have also been mixed. Some view the removal of the blindfold as a reflection of self-awareness, suggesting that the judiciary, in reality, is not always impartial. Others see the new design as a positive, modern representation of justice. Nonetheless, the redesigned statue continues to spark discussions about the evolving symbolism of justice in India’s judicial system.