Tesla is set to debut its Optimus humanoid robots alongside its electric vehicles by 2025. Elon Musk recently hinted on Twitter that Tesla will soon have “genuinely useful humanoid robots” in low production for internal use next year, signaling a significant step forward in robotics. However, despite decades of development, creating practical humanoid robots remains a challenge. The question is whether we truly need them and if they will meet expectations.
Tesla’s Optimus is entering a field already populated by notable contenders like Boston Dynamics’ Atlas, Figure AI’s Figure 01, and Sanctuary AI’s Phoenix. These robots typically feature bipedal designs capable of walking, jumping, and performing various tasks with dexterous arms and hands. They are often envisioned for roles in factories, service industries, and social care, and even in more controversial areas like humanoid sex robots.
The technical hurdles for humanoid robots are substantial. Achieving fluid bipedal locomotion on diverse terrains and dexterous object manipulation remains difficult. For example, replicating the human body’s adaptability and sensory capabilities in robots is still a work in progress. The challenge is compounded by the need for robots to function in unpredictable real-world conditions, such as varying weather and environmental factors.
The fascination with humanoid robots raises broader questions. Given that our built environment is designed for human use, it makes sense for robots to mimic human form. However, this approach might reinforce existing biases and fail to accommodate diverse needs. Some argue that focusing on robots that are not human-like could better address practical challenges and enhance accessibility.
Tesla’s initiative, while ambitious, will test whether humanoid robots can live up to their potential. The pursuit may drive significant technological advancements, but the ultimate value and impact of such robots remain to be seen.