---

UN and US sign a $2 billion humanitarian funding pact to support 17 crisis-hit countries and the CERF, amid sharp declines in overall US foreign aid.

---

Introduction: A Lifeline in a Year of Aid Retrenchment

At a moment when global humanitarian needs are surging and donor fatigue is setting in, the United Nations and the United States have formalized a $2 billion humanitarian funding agreement aimed at supporting some of the world’s most vulnerable populations. The pact, covering 17 crisis-affected countries and the UN’s Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF), stands out not only for its scale but also for its timing—coming amid sharp reductions in overall US foreign aid contributions.

For millions facing conflict, climate disasters, and economic collapse, the agreement represents more than a budgetary decision. It is a critical lifeline in a year when humanitarian agencies warn that funding gaps could translate directly into loss of life.

---

Context & Background: Shrinking Aid, Rising Crises

Humanitarian needs have expanded dramatically over the past decade, driven by protracted conflicts, extreme weather events, food insecurity, and mass displacement. According to UN assessments, the number of people requiring emergency assistance globally has nearly doubled since 2016.

Against this backdrop, US humanitarian funding has experienced a steep decline. UN data shows that total US contributions to UN humanitarian efforts fell to approximately $3.38 billion in 2025, down from $14.1 billion the previous year, and significantly lower than the $17.2 billion peak recorded in 2022.

These reductions followed broader foreign aid cuts under the Trump administration, which reshaped Washington’s approach to international assistance. While the US remains one of the largest humanitarian donors globally, the contraction in funding has forced UN agencies to scale back or delay life-saving programs in multiple regions.

The newly signed $2 billion agreement is therefore being viewed as a partial but strategically targeted response to widening humanitarian shortfalls.

---

Main Developments: What the Agreement Covers and Why It Matters

Scope of the Funding Pact

Under the agreement, the United States commits $2 billion in humanitarian assistance to support UN-led relief operations across 17 crisis-hit countries:

• Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador
• Ukraine
• Haiti
• Nigeria, Ethiopia, South Sudan, Mozambique
• Myanmar
• Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
• Sudan
• Bangladesh
• Syria
• Uganda, Kenya, Chad

In addition, a portion of the funding will be routed through the UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF), allowing rapid deployment to sudden and underfunded emergencies.

Supporting the UN’s 2026 Humanitarian Plan

The funding is designed to underpin the UN’s 2026 humanitarian response plan, which aims to reach 87 million people with emergency food, healthcare, shelter, clean water, and protection services. These populations include refugees, internally displaced persons, and communities trapped in active conflict zones or climate-vulnerable regions.

What makes the agreement particularly significant is its emphasis on speed and flexibility—two factors often missing in traditional aid mechanisms.

---

CERF Explained: The UN’s Rapid-Response Backbone

The Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) was established by the UN General Assembly in December 2005 and became operational in March 2006. It is widely regarded as one of the fastest and most effective humanitarian financing tools in the world.

Core Objectives of CERF

CERF is designed to:

• Enable early action to reduce loss of life
• Address time-critical humanitarian needs
• Strengthen responses in underfunded and neglected crises

Its rapid response window allows UN country teams to launch coordinated relief operations within days of a new emergency, often before media attention or donor pledges materialize.

Managed by the UN Emergency Relief Coordinator on behalf of the Secretary-General, CERF operates under strict transparency and reporting standards, ensuring that funds are allocated quickly and used responsibly.

Track Record and Climate Focus

Since its creation, CERF has:

• Assisted hundreds of millions of people
• Disbursed $9.6 billion across more than 110 countries and territories
• Directed $3.3 billion to underfunded crises
• Maintained an annual funding target of $1 billion

In recent years, CERF has emerged as the leading global humanitarian funding tool for climate-related emergencies. At COP28, it launched the Climate Action Account, enabling anticipatory action and life-saving projects that also strengthen resilience in climate-vulnerable communities.

---

Expert Insight & Public Reaction: Cautious Relief, Lingering Concerns

Humanitarian experts have broadly welcomed the agreement, describing it as a “necessary intervention” rather than a comprehensive solution.

Aid analysts note that while the $2 billion commitment will stabilize several high-risk operations, it does not fully compensate for the broader decline in US humanitarian contributions. “This funding will save lives,” one senior humanitarian official observed, “but it also highlights how fragile the global aid system has become when major donors pull back.”

Civil society organizations have echoed this sentiment, urging sustained and predictable funding rather than episodic injections tied to political cycles. Public reaction in crisis-affected regions has been cautiously hopeful, particularly in countries like Sudan, Ukraine, and Haiti, where humanitarian conditions have deteriorated sharply.

---

Impact & Implications: Who Benefits and What Comes Next

Immediate Impact

In the short term, the funding is expected to:

• Prevent large-scale food pipeline breaks
• Sustain emergency health and nutrition programs
• Support displaced populations during peak crisis periods
• Enable faster responses to sudden shocks, including climate disasters

For underfunded crises—often overshadowed by geopolitically prominent conflicts—the CERF component could prove especially vital.

Long-Term Implications

Strategically, the agreement signals continued US engagement with multilateral humanitarian frameworks, even amid domestic debates over foreign aid. It also reinforces CERF’s role as a central pillar of the global humanitarian architecture, particularly in addressing climate-driven emergencies.

However, experts warn that unless broader donor funding rebounds, humanitarian agencies may face difficult prioritization choices in 2026 and beyond.

---

Conclusion: A Critical Step, Not a Final Answer

The $2 billion humanitarian funding pact between the UN and the United States arrives at a critical juncture—offering timely relief to millions while exposing the growing tension between rising global needs and shrinking aid budgets. For the 17 crisis-affected countries included, the agreement could mean the difference between survival and catastrophe for vulnerable communities.

Yet, as humanitarian demands continue to escalate, the pact also serves as a reminder that sustainable, predictable funding—not emergency stopgaps—will be essential to meeting the challenges of an increasingly fragile world.

---

•