---

Russia welcomes President Trump’s new national security strategy, marking an unusual moment of alignment between Washington and Moscow on global power dynamics.

---

A Strategic Surprise From Moscow

In a striking shift on the global chessboard, the Kremlin offered unusually warm praise for President Donald Trump’s newly unveiled national security strategy, an endorsement not often heard from a nation long cast as Washington’s geopolitical rival. Russian officials said the document reflects many of Moscow’s own strategic assumptions, a rare public convergence between two powers whose relations have been strained for decades.

A Relationship Built on Tension

Relations between the United States and Russia have oscillated dramatically since the end of the Cold War. The Soviet Union’s collapse opened a brief window of cooperation, from nuclear disarmament efforts in the early 1990s to joint counterterrorism initiatives after the September 11 attacks. Yet the partnership unraveled as NATO expanded eastward, a move Moscow interpreted as encroachment on its traditional sphere of influence.

By the time Vladimir Putin rose to the presidency in 1999, the rupture was widening. Washington frequently criticized Russia’s posture in Europe and beyond, while Moscow accused the U.S. of trying to impose a unipolar world order. For years, strategic documents published by U.S. administrations labeled Russia as a threat or destabilizing force.

Against this historical backdrop, Moscow’s warm reception of Trump’s strategy marks a notable departure.

Trump’s Strategy Finds a Receptive Audience in Moscow

President Trump’s new national security blueprint outlines a worldview he describes as “flexible realism,” reasserting U.S. interests while signaling a desire to recalibrate relations with major powers. The strategy renews aspects of the Monroe Doctrine, framing the Western Hemisphere as a region where Washington intends to maintain primary influence.

Among its most pointed warnings, the document asserts that Europe risks “civilizational erasure,” emphasizes the need for a negotiated path toward ending the war in Ukraine, and calls for restoring strategic stability with Russia.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told state media that these shifts align closely with Russia’s own long-standing geopolitical assessments. The changes, he said, “correspond in many ways to our vision,” offering rare validation of a U.S. policy blueprint from Moscow’s upper ranks.

The message is clear: in several key areas, Russia sees Trump’s approach as closer to its own worldview than that of previous U.S. administrations.

From ‘Evil Empire’ to Strategic Convergence

The transformation is remarkable when measured against the rhetoric of the past. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union regularly framed the United States as a declining capitalist empire. Meanwhile, in 1983, President Ronald Reagan famously declared the USSR an “evil empire,” capturing the deep ideological chasm between the nations.

Post-Soviet Russia initially sought a cooperative relationship with the West, but NATO’s expansion, outlined in President Bill Clinton’s 1994 strategy, sparked lasting resentment that helped shape Putin’s foreign policy doctrine. Under Trump, however, Russia sees the potential for a different dynamic.

One line in the U.S. strategy particularly caught Moscow’s attention: the suggestion that the U.S. should curb the “perception and prevent the reality” of NATO as an ever-expanding military bloc. Peskov called the statement encouraging, signaling an openness to dialogue that rarely emerges on the NATO front.

‘Deep State’ Concerns Persist

Despite the positive tone, Russian officials maintain a level of skepticism. Peskov suggested that America’s entrenched bureaucracy, what Trump has referred to as the “deep state”, may not fully embrace the president’s vision. According to the Kremlin, these institutional forces often view global affairs through a different strategic lens than Trump himself.

Critics in the U.S., however, reject the notion of a “deep state” entirely, arguing that the term is used to justify sweeping executive power and discredit career officials. This divergence highlights a key obstacle: even as Moscow signals an openness to Trump’s plan, the internal U.S. debate over governance and authority remains unresolved.

Washington and Moscow Pivot Toward China

Both nations are also recalibrating their focus on China, which the strategy identifies as a central economic and geopolitical battleground, especially in the Indo-Pacific region. The U.S. strategy calls for strengthening American and allied military capabilities to deter conflict with Beijing, particularly over Taiwan.

Russia, meanwhile, has deepened its partnership with China in response to Western sanctions imposed after Moscow’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. With Europe attempting to sever dependence on Russian energy, China has become a critical economic and political ally for the Kremlin.

Trump has frequently warned that a deepening Russia–China alliance could shift the global balance of power. In an interview earlier this year, he said history teaches one clear lesson: “You don’t want Russia and China to get together.”

A Moment of Alignment, But Not a Reset

The Kremlin’s approval of Trump’s strategy does not necessarily signal a rapid thaw in relations. Instead, it underscores shifting strategic priorities at a moment when global power blocs are being reshaped by war, sanctions, and emerging rivalries.

For Russia, Trump’s document offers a rare opening to engage the U.S. on issues like arms control and strategic stability, areas where dialogue has nearly collapsed in recent years. For Washington, it provides a framework for managing threats while acknowledging the need for pragmatic engagement with major powers.

Yet many questions remain. Will U.S. institutions follow Trump’s direction? Can Washington and Moscow rebuild trust without concessions on NATO or Ukraine? And how will China’s growing influence shape the calculations of both capitals?

These unresolved factors make the current alignment notable, but fragile.

A Cautious Convergence in an Uncertain World

The Kremlin’s endorsement of Trump’s national security strategy marks an unusual moment of harmony between two historic adversaries. While the alignment may not translate into immediate cooperation, it highlights how rapidly global dynamics are evolving and how old assumptions can shift almost overnight.

As Washington and Moscow navigate competing pressures, from China’s rise to Europe’s security anxieties, the future of this tentative convergence will depend on actions taken far beyond the pages of any strategy document. For now, the world is watching whether this moment represents a fleeting overlap or the first step toward a new phase in U.S.–Russia relations.

 

ALSO READ:  African Union Suspends Guinea-Bissau After Military Coup