---

India beat Pakistan to retain the Asia Cup, but their refusal to accept the trophy from Pakistan’s interior minister Mohsin Naqvi sparked a political storm.

---

A Victory Overshadowed

India clinched the Asia Cup title on Sunday with a five-wicket win over Pakistan, but the triumph was marred by controversy. In a rare political standoff on the cricket field, the Indian team declined to accept the trophy from Pakistan’s interior minister and Asian Cricket Council (ACC) president, Mohsin Naqvi, turning what should have been a celebratory moment into a tense spectacle.

Rivalry Beyond Cricket

The India–Pakistan rivalry has long transcended the boundaries of sport. The two nuclear-armed neighbors, who fought a brief but heated conflict in May that nearly escalated into war, continue to let political tensions seep into cricket. Since 1947, they have fought three wars two directly over Kashmir while bilateral cricketing ties remain frozen. Matches now take place only at neutral venues in multinational tournaments, with emotions often running high.

In this year’s Asia Cup, staged in the United Arab Emirates, the two sides met three times. India walked away victorious on each occasion, underscoring their dominance in one of the world’s fiercest sporting rivalries.

Trophy Refusal and Delayed Ceremony

India’s latest win came at Dubai International Stadium, where Tilak Varma’s unbeaten 69 guided them to victory after Pakistan collapsed for 146. Yet the spotlight quickly shifted from the pitch to the presentation stage.

The post-match ceremony was delayed by more than an hour, and when it finally began, it ended abruptly before the trophy handover. Broadcaster Simon Doull announced on air that the Indian players had declined to collect their awards. BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia later confirmed the decision, stating that the team would not accept the trophy from Naqvi, who also chairs the Pakistan Cricket Board.

“The players chose not to receive the trophy from the ACC chairman, given his senior role in the Pakistan government,” Saikia explained, adding that India would raise the matter formally with the International Cricket Council (ICC).

Awards and Silent Protests

While the team refused the trophy, individual honors were still collected. Tilak Varma was named player of the match, Abhishek Sharma player of the tournament, and Kuldeep Yadav MVP. However, they neither acknowledged Naqvi nor shook hands, a pattern consistent throughout the tournament, where Indian players avoided customary gestures with their Pakistani counterparts.

Notably, Naqvi stood on stage without clapping as the Indian stars accepted their awards a silence that spoke volumes amid the tense atmosphere.

Public and Political Reactions

Indian captain Suryakumar Yadav referenced the May clashes, dedicating an earlier win against Pakistan to India’s armed forces. The sentiment resonated in New Delhi, where President Droupadi Murmu congratulated the team on social media. Prime Minister Narendra Modi struck an even sharper note, writing:

“#OperationSindoor on the games field. Outcome is the same – India wins! Congrats to our cricketers.”

The symbolic reference to India’s military strikes against Pakistan highlighted how cricket has become yet another stage for geopolitical signaling.

The Match in Focus: Pakistan’s Collapse

Overshadowed by the politics was an intense final. Pakistan had started well with an 84-run opening stand between Sahibzada Farhan (57) and Fakhar Zaman (46). But their batting collapsed dramatically, losing nine wickets for just 33 runs. Kuldeep Yadav’s four-wicket spell dismantled their middle order.

Chasing 147, India stumbled early at 20-3, but Varma, supported by Sanju Samson (24) and Shivam Dube (33), steadied the innings and guided the team home. Pakistan captain Salman Agha admitted it was a painful defeat, saying:

“We fought hard with the ball, but our batting let us down. We failed to rotate strike and lost too many wickets at crucial stages.”

Impact & Implications: Cricket as a Political Mirror

The Asia Cup trophy standoff underscored how cricket remains hostage to the fragile relationship between India and Pakistan. While fans witnessed memorable performances, the refusal to share a stage with Pakistan’s minister highlighted the deep mistrust that defines ties between the neighbors.

The BCCI’s decision to escalate the issue to the ICC suggests further diplomatic ripples ahead. For Pakistan, failing to beat India in three attempts during the tournament may add pressure on their cricket board and players. For India, remaining unbeaten reinforced their supremacy on the field, even as politics continued to dominate the narrative off it.

Conclusion: A Tournament Defined by More Than Sport

India’s unbeaten run and Asia Cup triumph should have been remembered for resilience and standout performances. Instead, it will be recalled for a trophy that never changed hands. Cricket once again proved it is more than just a game for India and Pakistan it is a reflection of unresolved disputes, national pride, and political signaling.

(Disclaimer:  This article is based on verified reports and official statements. It presents the events factually and avoids speculation.)

 

ASLO READ:  India Clinches Asia Cup Glory with Thrilling Win Over Pakistan